Cum on faces

 

Having another guy's spunk - or your own - on your face feels good but to experience it to the full it really needs to be seen, and not only by the guy whose jizz it is. If there's only me and one other guy I'm sucking, I'd far rather he pumped his load into my mouth for me to gulp down than to have his jizz adorn my skin, face or anywhere else. If it does, by accident or intention, end up anywhere other than down my throat I've got to scoop it up with my fingers and lick it off. 

                        --------------------------

One thing I've always wished I'd had done was to have the guy I'm sucking film me in the act, his cock in my mouth, and to include showing his cum-spurts - or even for him just to photograph it, so I'd be able to post it on my blogs for the entire world to see - and be so fuckin' proud of! 

Isn't it strange, as well as being quite funny, that when you see a video of a guy shooting his spunk onto the face of another guy, even when the latter is expecting and waiting for it, the first spurt so often hits the receiving guy in the eye? I wonder why that is. He nearly always reacts in shock, as though he'd never thought it would happen.

                    --------------------------------

Now here's a fuckin' attractive daddy. I'm sure he likes cum as much as most - or ALL? - of us do..........

.........and I'm willing to bet he loves to gobble it down.

                  --------------------------------

And then there's bukkake, which easily merits a post - or several posts - or many - dedicated to that subject alone. 

It's always great to watch though the participants must feel frustrated when what they'd most be wanting is for their spunk it end up inside their target, either orally or anally. But of course they're all being paid for the so-called 'money-shot' where we can see them ejaculating onto the lucky(?) 'victim' though I'm sure that many of the latter would also rather have had all that spunk inside their bodies.

                        ----------------------

A Japanese video is circulating of one very fortunate young guy being held down to have more than fifty guys cumming on him, mostly on his face, but dripping down over his shoulders and chest too. It becomes progressively an increasingly beautiful, if completely 'messy', sight, his face glistening under all that shot spunk:-

                       ----------------------------------------------------

I've been lucky(?) enough to have participated in a couple of bukkake sessions, though neither was properly organised. The first where I was one of only about half-a-dozen 'tossers' was more of a spur-of-the-moment thing, the other only slightly better with eight or nine, the 'target' being an ageing daddy. Bit of a bore after your first cumming having to wait around till you're ready to shoot again. However I do greatly regret never having had the chance of being the central target in a large and well-organised bukkake, something I can now only fantasise about as I'm sure it'll never happen. (I wanna swallow so much spunk from so many different men that I could burst!)                

                     -----------------------------

I especially like to see dark-skinned men with cum on their face. There's something about the contrast between the creamy white spunk and the dusky skin on which it lands that gives it that something 'special' look. 

But I do wish I could find more examples of Indian (my favourites, of course) men's faces covered in man-juice. The first guy above looks to be a likely Indian. A turbanned Sikh would be be an incredible sight, though I don't recall ever having seen one. Below is a another example of the kind of guy I want to see more of - only with lots more snowy-white jizz adorning his tawny-skinned face :-

And to close (just for now) here's one very contented spunky face. Smile away, you lucky spunk-lover:-

Drawings of forced man-milking. Great fun!

 I think all these, mainly by artist 'Franco', are great. If they're not already familiar to you I hope you like them as much as I do. Each time I look at them I almost piss myself laughing.

I've got hundreds more saved up of similar gay porn 'artwork' from numerous artists on all kinds of situations (including some more of man-milking). I've really got to post more of them on this blog for you all to enjoy rather than just keep them on my files largely unseen. As well as putting a smile on your face I'm sure they'll as readily give some of you 'stirrings' down below like they do for me.

And here are a couple of 'tasters'. I'm well aware that my post popular blogs have been those of gay incest, so here's two illustrations of consensual father/ son sex........

Plenty more to cum..........😁

Fans of Jesus look away NOW........

 

This is not me, but in my religious (Roman Catholic) days the image would absolutely have shocked and appalled me, and even now I can well recall the feeling of horror which I would have experienced. So likewise of those who are currently of a religious, specifically Christian, disposition. But I'm for many years now I've been well past that attitude and now wish to share with others as broad-minded as I like to think myself as being, just a little of the stuff on the subject matter which I've picked up from the internet over the years. 

Saint John the Baptist gives Jesus a facial, baptising him in his spunk, which Jesus appreciates as we can see from his circumcised cock:-

Jesus, so impressed by his facial, tries a multi-cocked piss-'n-cum bath - and fuckin' loves it:- 

 Now it's getting close to the end, so not just the 'Last Supper' but the 'Last Orgy', a fine free-for-all:-

'The Agony in the Garden' of Gethsemane where Satan knows that a fool-proof way to tempt a man successfully (well, all except one) is to remind him of the incredible, intense ecstasy a man gets by having his shithole licked, as I'm sure you all know from your own experience:-  

After being arrested, tried, then tied to pillar to be scourged.......

 .....he's 'crowned'.........and then made to lie with one of his torturers who'd got excited during the scourging:-

After carrying the cross to Calvary, Jesus is stripped and nailed, but before the nailing is complete, and while his legs can still be prised apart, he's gang-raped by the Roman soldiers doing the execution - Jesus is, after all, a 'trophy' victim and they don't want to waste their chance. I don't think for a moment that the raping even gang-rape, either in private or openly, of a prisoner was that uncommon. There would have been no 'legal' prohibition of it. Besides, crucifixion was so frequent and such a mundane affair that those whose duties were to enforce it would have wanted their boredom alleviated. I wrote in a previous blog of Roman soldiers who, for their own 'amusement', would sometimes crucify their victims by nailing them to their crosses in twisted, contorted positions. And here we have a man claiming (in a sense) to be not only superior to all the rest of humanity, but capable of preventing suffering to himself by his mere will. You could say the he was 'asking for it'!

We know now that when a victim carried his cross to the place of execution, it wasn't a full cross but only the crossbeam (more than heavy enough anyway!) with the vertical standing beam already fixed in the earth, to be re-used over and over again. We're familiar with some of these standing beams having been sadistically fitted with an upward-pointing metal spike at around bum height, so that the victim, when nailed in hanging position and practically immobile, but still able to just about wiggle the centre of his body, to do anything, anything to even slightly alleviating the agonising weight on his arm and shoulders, could try to hoist himself up and try to rest on what it was he could feel behind him. And so he'd with yet additional horror feel that trying to sit on the metal spike he'd impaled himself over the toadstool-shaped head of the spike, so made that after his hole muscles had closed around it it'd be impossible to hoist himself off again. And with the spike now deep up his bum, getting higher and higher, it would be tearing away at his innards. But whether Jesus himself was subjected to this particular extra dose of sadism is, of course, unknown. However, what is probable is that many crucifixion victims couldn't help but have the additional humiliation of displaying erections, they having now lost all control of their bodies, muscles and functions, including pissing and cacking themselves. Not an edifying sight, to be sure. But what's a couple more humiliations on top of what they've already endured? But not only that. Some would helplessly ejaculate, shooting out the very final spurts of their lives, hot spunk (any scanty loincloth permitting, if worn at all) plop, plop, plop onto the ground below - perhaps into the eager open mouth of a Roman soldier? Who knows?

And so there he is - Hallelujah!:-

This picture, apart from the juicy hard-on and the inaccurate depiction of nails bring driven through the palms of the hands rather than the wrists, shows a Christ looking rather bored with the whole affair, as if waiting for the commercial break to be over. Still, his stiff-cocked angels look to be fancying each other.

In a previous blog some years ago I wrote at length on the question of whether the victims of crucifixion were allowed some minimum dignity by their being provided with some kind of loincloth, which may have been no more than a scanty, tattered rag - or were they exhibited openly exposed in full-cocked humiliation? The likelihood seems to have been that it all depended - sometimes on the area, sometimes on local practice, sometimes on the whim of the executioners. But why should any time have been wasted on the question at all, considering crucifixions for all sorts of crimes were so regular and so frequent? In Jerusalem alone one estimate is that around this time there were about 300 such executions per year! I've seen a scholarly surmise that around half of all crucifixions everywhere within the Roman Empire were carried out with the victim being totally naked, though highly likely to have been more. What is certain is that there was never a compulsory loincloth-wearing ordinance for everywhere. 

Of course, most of the art we see depicting the crucifixion shows the figure as wearing at least something to hide his 'tackle', but does it really have to be as unsexy as the following? What's he wearing - swimming trunks? It really spoils a scene which otherwise could have been most interesting.   

This one below is much better, a good-sized cock which any man - or king - would be well satisfied to own!

So, three days later - voila! - up he rises..............

The End - or is it?.........

              -----------------------------------------

To finish with, here's some guys demonstrating what they think of the whole story.......

And if you're really, really keen to show what you think, there's something very special for you......

And really finally, how about a handy peg, somewhere for those paedo priests to hang their dog collars when they strip off prior to them fucking some poor, unlucky altar boy:-

AMEN!