Lucky guy in middle

Would it be unappreciative to suggest it'd be even better for him if he'd had a third someone sucking his cock at the same time? But as it is if I was this lucky one I'd be very satisfied indeed with the set up I'd got.

Night flasher

Sure wouldn't complain if he jumped out of the dark shadows in front of me. He wouldn't need to make any moves or say anything 'cos I'd be down on my knees in a jiffy, with my hands reaching round to feel his bum muscles giving warning by their clenching when he's about to shoot his hot jizz straight down my throat, hardly touching the sides.

Indian cock of perfection.

If there's anything more tasty-looking than this very tempting, suckable beauty I demand to see it. Wonder if he's got some cheese stored away under that hood there.

On their way to.......where?....and why?

Obviously a still from a video (which I haven't identified), probably from near the start. Six young men being ordered to walk stark naked in single file clearly with the aim of getting to a certain location - or being instructed to march around a field - after which they'll be ordered to perform certain activities, the likes of which we'll have to leave to our imaginations.  Maybe it'd be a bit more interesting if they had to progress by in turns the one at the back having to leap-frog over the five in front of him. Except for one who finds it a bit of a joke, for which I hope he'll have to pay, all the others look a bit unsure of the purpose, even apprehensive, as they walk very purposefully to the designated area. Maybe they haven't yet been told what they'll have to do, something which I really wanna see. Hope it's appropriately degrading, 'cos I do know something about that and I do like to have a good laugh.😁

Selling or just posing?.

That biker jacket doesn't fool me. I can't believe he's just got off his motor-bike, and parked it round the corner. Although my attention isn't entirely on what he's wearing it does indicate where his tastes probably lie - a bit of S/M, maybe? Handsome face, btw.

Perfect suck-triangle

Watertight, all sides joined up nicely with no gaps - the watchword being 'Take it as you give it'. Gobble gobble, slurp slurp

Public exposure taken to its limit.

WOW fuckin' WOW! Would have liked to have known the background story, where it is and all further details. 
A public humiliation doesn't get much more severe and blatant than this - being trussed up naked and put on display in a stores window as though he was a piece of meat in a butcher's shop. He clearly had committed some outrageous misdemeanour for which he's being appropriately punished so I've no sympathy with his plight. He must have deserved it. Although one part of him is clearly experiencing a degree of excitement I'm sure that inside his mind he must be embarrassed as Hell. Ha ha! And having to endure a never-ending stream of onlookers who are photographing him - including, it looks like one guy with a movie camera. Fuck only knows where the pics will end up. Too bad. All part of the punishment. Looks like his situation has even got a couple of the public randy - they're putting all their attention into their own kissing, of all things!
They should be adding to his pain by laughing at him, pointing at his cock. 

Another Indian who puts fire in my balls.

A to-be-licked-all-over man. How I'd love to have a really mucky naked roll around on the carpet with him, we both being as filthy as fuck - no holds barred. I wanna be fuckin' used for whatever purpose he deems fit for his own pleasure and satisfaction. And if he doesn't believe that, all I'd say is "Just try me!"

Indian shower-suck

The state of extreme stiffness of the sucker's cock shows that he's not sucking just to gain a few extra rupees, but he's getting genuine pleasure from the act. Just look at its condition of advanced excitement! I'd so like to take that fuck-stick deep into my own mouth while he's engaged at his top end and increase his stimulated state still further by being the willing receptacle for his rich, hot Desi jizz, greedily gulping down the genes and DNA from the male side of his Indian ancestry. 

Rumpy-pumpy sat on a wall.......

.......or is it a felled tree trunk? Anyway, it's splendid to see such a fine figure of a man who's not afraid to spread his legs to show us all the magnificence he's got - and he's got me a-slavering..

Did younger one have practice with something smaller first?

On the other hand, if this was losing his virginity then it may be just as well as it'll have saved time getting to where he needed to be, rather than taking a series of cocks, all graded as to size. And his daddy's balls look like they're full of hot cum. He must be bursting to relieve himself by shooting a lot of it out and into the youngster's guts.

Who's this beauty in the frame?

He sho' is pretty as a picture. Wonder if he'd like to be painted in oils - and then hung.

A daddy who gives me a throb in my lower regions.

Looks like an assembling prior to a public (men only?) run-in-the buff, cocks and balls soon to be a-swinging and a-bouncing wholesale with gay abandon. 
I find this furry daddy in front as hot as fuck, with a face just pleading to be sat on and, at a shrewd guess, with a furry, tasty bum needing somewhere warm and spitty to plonk itself down on - and it just so happens that I've........😄

More public boners.

(Taken at some Pride event, probably San Fran?) 
If it's something they've just seen which has  caused them to be 'stimulated' them there's no doubt which of them is the greater impressed.

Standing out in a crowd.

The only reasons for why he's doing this that I can come up with is that either he's feeling randy and he's very brave (and pissed? - though his standing straight doesn't suggest it) - or it's some sort of a dare or forfeit (in either case it being fortuitous that he's evidently getting a great kick out of it, possibly on the very brink of 'eruption' without even touching). Just being naked by itself would have attracted some attention, but so publicly sporting a boner has made him a crowd-puller with several cameras out. Hope he achieves whatever it is he wants before the cops come and put a spoilsporting end to his 'fun' - or whatever it is.

An easy choice.

Just as well that I find the centre one here the most attractive. Though I do like a lot the daddy on the left with his good looks and fine hooded cock, his value is a bit reduced by both his tats and that ring around his cock and balls. As for the guy on the right, I've never liked metal piercings anywhere on anyone I'm having sex with, especially on somewhere where I'm likely to break a tooth or two. And is that ring removed whenever he wants to fuck anyone? Can it be taken off easily, leaving, presumably, two unsightly holes in the cockhead? (Shudder!) No, without hesitation I'll settle for young hottie in the middle.

An act of friendship

Just making sure the pisser doesn't splash on his shoes - and the smile says that he appreciates what's being done for him.

They must have had a suggestion to "Drop 'em".

And a fine sight the result is too. I think the two at each end quite cute, looking very much like brothers, something I personally find gives a group pic - or just a two-some - an added 'something'. If I could choose just a couple of them to suck off my choice is made. 

Indian curry-hot.

I've never made a secret of my lusting after good-looking Indian men, and here's a beauty who gets me tingling in all the right - and 'naughty' - places. I could just eat him up, every last fuckin' morsel of him. But before getting to that I'd wanna give him an all-over sloppy licking, every square millimeter, every fold, crease and hole (hairy or not), of his appetising body.

In a previous posting I've wondered about the origin of this particular strong feeling of mine towards Indian men (at least before they become big-bellied in middle age or later, as so any are prone to do, though it's not peculiar only to Indian men of course) a passion which is different and deeper in nature than for any other  nationality. Though I have neither memory or evidence of it I've suggested in a previous post that it just may be that because I've also had, uniquely in my family, a lifelong fetish in a certain direction, it could have been that when a baby I was sexually 'abused' (?) by a certain young male servant my family had. Being of European extraction, the family used to have a small retinue of Indian servants (this was prior to Indian independence in 1947) and there exists or existed a very old photograph, long since lost, of about half a dozen servants which my family employed - all female, I think, apart from this one sheepish-looking young lad (maybe of 15 or so?) looking at the ground as though not wanting to be photographed, while the others, all looking straight ahead, were either smiling or trying to smile. I remember being told that he, the boy, (and maybe some or all of the women too) were 'dalit' or 'untouchables' i.e. from the lowest class of Hindus. That mattered to my family not one bit, but what was striking about this photo, although it's many decades since I last saw it, was although being black and white (and rather faded at the time) was that this young man was wearing the very clothes I've had such a fetish for for my entire life - which was to be the critical reason for my becoming, after much persuasion, a Boy Scout in a disastrously doomed attempt, in the forlorn hope that by immersing myself in having to wear such a uniform, I might finally rid myself of this attraction which was having such an obsessive grip on my mind - with the result that you all know of, namely of solidifying, consolidating and making permanent this particular and rare (though not unique) fetish of mine. Anyway, this young man in the photo is dressed in the manner which was pretty much standard for most working-class males in India at this time, and indeed through much of the inter-tropics world - and is still seen there - 
 - though in the photo the lad's shirt is hanging loose outside the waist of his shorts. 
It's only a thought and an attempt to rationalise how I got where I did with my feelings. I may be entirely mistaken, of course, in which case I humbly apologise to the young man's memory (if he's still alive he must be around 90 by now) but if he ever did abuse me, he being the only male outside my family with whom I would have been close to, it could well explain why my being gay has been so indelibly linked with a fetish which is/was certainly not shared by any other member of my family, my brothers or my father. That's my theory, anyway. There must be some explanation for it - and it's the only possibility I can come up with,

So enough of that for now. Let's return to the thought of just enjoying the delicious taste of Indian men. Mmmmmm! 

Re-posting from 2011 - Scouts not allowed to wear underpants

I'd completely forgotten about posting this all those years ago. I thought it might be interesting to re-post it now and see if there's any reaction.

Why was our Boy Scout Troop forbidden to wear underpants under our shorts?

I don't know how many of you were in the Boy Scouts, but my brief membership had a profound effect on my life which has lasted to this day.
We didn't question the rule that underpants were NOT to be worn under our shorts because that was also the case during our P.E. classes where, if the gym master suspected that we were wearing anything under our black gym shorts, we'd hear something like the following exchange:-

"You boy! Have you got anything on under your shorts?"
" N-n-n-o, Sir."
"Come here! Let's see."

The boy would then apprehensively approach and stand nervously while the sadistic master pulled out the elasticated shorts waistband, peer down, and then, invariably and sadistically let it snap back painfully onto the boy's body. We'd always hear the boy's "Ooooo-yah!" or "Ouch!" while the rest of the class would try to hide their sniggers. This ritual was quite funny for us other boys witnessing the scene, but for the 'victim' it was a brief moment of sharp pain, as well as being humiliating. It happened to me just the once, but that was enough to know how it felt. (To be fair to the gym master himself, nasty bugger though he was, he always pulled the boy's shorts out on the side before looking down - never, as far as I know, either front or back.) The punishment if ever a boy was found to be wearing underpants was, after removing them, being made to take off one of his gym shoes, made to lie stomach down over the vaulting horse, his shorts then pulled down, and then given six sharp, severe slaps on his bare backside with his shoe. I saw it done only twice in all my years at school, but that punishment was so humiliating in front of all the class, even without the pain, that one had to wonder why a boy would ever chance being caught. It was far less humiliating to remove the underpants before the gym class started so you wouldn't have to face the possibility of this happening.

Anyway, that's all leading up to my saying that, as we saw scouting, like P.E., as essentially to do with physical activities, as far as I know no questions were asked about this odd requirement at the time. It was only later that I found that the 'no underpants' rule in our Scout troop was not only unusual, it was practically unknown elsewhere [though see comment from Anon below]. If I'd known about this before joining it might have saved me a lot of anguish as it turned out that this practice was to contribute to an excruciating sexual humiliation for me during Scout camp, at the vulnerable and impressionable age of 12 - and which may not have happened at all if underpants had been worn. Details of what happened will have to wait until a future blog (later insertion: and now has done). Actually it'll cover a number of them as the details of that fateful Summer camp will take some time to tell, and it would be unfair if any readers of my blog were not to be told ALL the details, painful as it is to me to relate it.

Now after many years of discreet enquiries and research, and failing to find any other scout troops which had this 'no underpants' rule I'd come to the conclusion that it must have been pretty well unique to my own Troop [NO. Not so!] which was, incidentally, run by Catholic priests. One can make an assumption about the reason for this rule, after the secret activities of a significant number of priests have now been opened up to the world, that this  was applied for their own shameful, randy purposes. But again to be fair, I never ever heard of any of these sorts of goings-on at any time when I was a pupil, though one can argue that if things actually were happening, would it have been widely known anyway?

I never heard of any scouts defying the rule, or even questioning it. What I do recall is a group of them, among the smutty laughs of boys their age, saying that you have to avoid farting as this will give rise to 'skid marks' inside the shorts. In fact they would sometimes laughingly refer to their khaki shorts as 'cacky shorts' - in the same way that Americans pronounce the 'k' word, with a short 'a'. (In colloquial English, 'cack' is another word for 'shit').
Not wearing shorts did have one advantage, though. When a scout had a piss, instead of undoing the fly-buttons and then re-doing them up afterwards, he could just lift up the shorts leg and piss out from under it. This also lessened the chance of getting the shorts wet. Because of their light colour, any drops not properly shaken off would soak through the drill material and show up clearly on the outer surface of the shorts, causing amusement and teasing from other scouts, and huge embarrassment to the victim.

Now, right up to date. Only quite recently, someone contacted me by e-mail, having seen one of my previous postings on this topic on another site, and he assures me that the 'no underpants' rule was certainly not unique to my Scout Troop.  Not common, true. but far from unknown. This is very interesting indeed, and comes as quite a revelation after so many years. (I've recently heard of quite a number of countries where this practice is occasionally found).

                    ---------------------------         

     

Is this scout above wearing anything under his shorts? If you've seen this video (one of my favourites, quite a vintage one) you'll have found out, after he's caught when trying to steal something from behind the fisher's back and, wrestled to the ground, he's forced to suck the man's cock. So humiliating for the lad - but serves him right! 😉

And finally, as an afterthought, I must remind you of Scout Law 10 which Lord Baden Powell himself (a man to whom we'd only be worthy enough to offer our tongues to use as his toilet paper), in his infinite wisdom, belatedly added to the already existing laws, namely that "A boy scout is pure in thought, word and deed" - So beware! 😁😁😁 
Hah! Now tell that to the four senior scouts who took away my 'innocence' at the tender age of 12 just for their own amusement and with no regard at all for the indelible mental scars they were inflicting, wrapping me for eternity in an inescapable web of fetishes, thereby pointing me on a road to complete corruption, too enticing for me to resist, and instigating my subsequent lifelong, insatiable craving for cock,  cock.......and yet more cock. 

And as a further afterthought, it's often been said that if Lord B-P. had had any serious inkling about what goes on in those scout tents after dark, either by torchlight under covers or without, he'd wish to God that he'd never started the Scout Movement. But what did he expect with all those boys in their adolescence with growth hormones starting to race around their young bodies, and they exploring and experimenting with their own, as well as being just as curious about the bodies of other boys? It wouldn't have needed much imagination, would it? 😄