Wednesday 11 March 2020

Don't he wanna remove those shorts?

Surely he wants to give total and unhindered access for his balls and shithole areas to be licked, and licked well - especially when his sucker's such a hottie -  then slowly leading up to firing his hot spunky bullets into that eager, handsome head. 

8 comments:

  1. I don't know where you find these enticing and exciting pics but they and especially your comments certainly get a 'stirring in my pants' ... the exercise of playing "peekaboo" is so HOT and slowly revealing genitalia and "the eye" for personal oral attention demands concentration! Of course an audience is ALWAYS welcome :-O YUMMY

    ReplyDelete
  2. They are from my 'collection' going back some years. db. Whenever I see something which causes me to twitch 'down there' I just save it - not especially to post it again like I'm doing now, but for my own private delectation in my own time. But I must say that when I share them and see the number of views I get, and even moreso when someone like you offers his appreciation, I do get a buzz knowing that a particular pic does things not just for me alone..
    I've accumulated enough of them to last at least two years, maybe three - and that's if I post one every day. I'm sure that where your tastes overlap with mine, as they seem to do considerably, there'll be for you much more 'satisfaction to cum.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Dear "KinkyKhaki" ... How I appreciate your 'sharing' and that we have so many perversions shared in common! My cock's cum explodes with thankful delight with 'each' new post !!! All could only be improved IF we were physically naked together !?! Such a delightful thought! Yummy ... your "Randy" devotee :-)
    ps - I would speculate that MANY share our interests but have difficulty publishing a comment as I did earlier !?!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Thanks ever so much for what you say about being "naked together", db, (I appreciate it was only a throwaway line from you) but I'm not sure you realise just how old I now am - and I mean 'OLD'! I doubt if I'd ever be of interest to anyone who doesn't go for, not just 'daddies' but GRANdaddies! I do hope you're not TOO disappointed.
    On the subject of fading looks and bodies, just the other day I came across a photo of a guy who looks uncannily like how I used to look when I was at my best - i.e. probably in my 30s - that it made me do a double-take and, frankly, gave me the creeps. The only difference is that his beard is visibly brown whereas mine always looked to be black - at least before it started turning into the Father Xmas white which it now is! (Far, far more on the chin now than on top!) I'll put that guy's pic up in one of my forthcoming posts with a reference to it looking very much like how I appeared.
    Yes, I want to think that there are many guys around who share my/our 'interests' but are too shy to acknowledge it to others, though I should have thought that the ability of going anonymous would have taken away any such inhibitions. But when they do' come out' as you have done, it makes me feel really happy for them. I await all such guys hovering in the background to bite the bullet and declare themselves with no shame. I would never pry into asking them to reveal their real identities. I hope anyone reading this reply to your comment might encourage more to do so.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I too qualify as a 'granddaddy' so no illusions or "throwaway lines" here! I've been appreciated by and appreciating 'mature' men since my teens ... a stiff cock and welcoming mouth knows no bounds !?! Just because we've reached the "troll age" doesn't mean M2M sex is no longer relevant ... sometimes those "early pictures" and the 'excitement' they create are more for fantasy pleasures but then again, what more could an 'older' exhibitionist/voyeur want ???
    As a possibility for lack of comments: "cell phones" ... I peruse most of your blogs on my phone but I've learned that attempting to 'publish' a response to one of your posts has not been successful but rather on a PC I can be verbose !!!
    Obviously we're of similar interests & experiences and I also would encourage others to participate ... group therapy if you will !?!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for that, db. Your comments are reassuring and it's good to know that we have more in common than just our 'inclinations'. I just didn't want you to build me up into someone I certainly aren't now, though maybe as I used to be a long, long time ago. You too must have gone through that era of contact ads when you find that the person, meeting him face-to-face, was nothing like the one he'd described he was. Hut let's appreciate our mutual enjoyments together even if at a distance.

      I didn't know (or had forgotten) the problem with 'cell phones'. I've never had anything other than a simple land-line myself so am not conversant with the difficulties these 'modern contraptions' bring. I'd like to think that the reason for the rarity of comments I get is at least partly due to others having the like problem. It's good of you to persist to eventually get here. I hope others do too as I genuinely do value every single (non-abusive) comment, giving me a 'buzz' knowing that a particular post of mine has caused some stirrings or even heightened 'excitement' in other guys pants - or out of them. :-)

      Delete
  6. Hi KinkyKhaki, think it's even better with the shorts on. The photo is PERFECT. Seen the sexy top daddy already online, he's a total stud. Very handsome!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yup, I can see why it's sometimes a change to seeing a couple being both stark bollock naked. We don't wanna see that ALL the time, do we? (Or.....?)
      The top guy sure is a sexy-looker, though in my case it's the hottie bearded sucker who catches my eye even more. But it's all only personal, ain't it? :-)

      Delete